By Sarah Dayan
I’m a big advocate for utility-first CSS. After trying several methods over the years, it’s what I’ve found to be the best, most maintainable and scalable way of writing CSS to this day.
When my coworker Clément Denoix and I built api-search.io, I decided to use Tailwind CSS to style it. Tailwind CSS is a theme-agnostic, fully customizable, utility-first library.
The whole point of a library is to give you access to a broad set of tools to use at will. The problem is, since you usually use only a subset of it, you end up with a lot of unused CSS rules in your final build.
In my case, not only did I load the entire Tailwind CSS library, but I also added several variants to some modules. That ended up making the final minified CSS file weight 259 KB (before GZip). That’s quite heavy when you consider that the website is a simple single-page app with a minimal design.
You don’t want to load each utility by hand when you need it. That would be a long and cumbersome task. A better scenario is to have everything at your disposal during development and automatically remove what you didn’t use during the build step.
In JavaScript, we call it tree-shaking. Now, thanks to PurgeCSS, you can do the same with your CSS codebase.
PurgeCSS analyzes your content files and your CSS, then matches the selectors together. If it doesn’t find any occurrence of a selector in the content, it removes it from the CSS file.
For the most part, this can work out of the box. However, there are some areas in any website that may require some more thinking before letting PurgeCSS do its magic.
Splitting my CSS
The project contains three main CSS files:
- A CSS reset called normalize.css, included in Tailwind CSS.
- Tailwind CSS, the most substantial part of my CSS codebase.
- Some custom CSS, mostly for styling the InstantSearch components to which I couldn’t add classes.
PurgeCSS can’t detect that I need to keep selectors such as .ais-Highlight
, because the components that use it only show up in the DOM at runtime. Same goes with normalize.css
: I’m relying on it to reset browser styles, but many of the related components will never be matched because they’re generated in JavaScript.
In the case of classes starting with .ais-
, we can sort them out with whitelisting. Now when it comes to reset styles, selectors are a bit trickier to track down. Plus, the size of normalize.css
is pretty insignificant and isn’t bound to change. So in this case, I decided to ignore the file altogether. Consequently, I had to split styles before running PurgeCSS.
My initial CSS configuration looked like this:
- A
tailwind.src.css
file with three@tailwind
directives:preflight
,components
andutilities
. - An
App.css
file with my custom styles. - An npm script in
package.json
to build Tailwind CSS right before starting or building the project. Every time this script runs, it outputs atailwind.css
file insrc
, which is loaded in the project.
The @tailwind preflight
directive loads normalize.css
. I didn’t want PurgeCSS to touch it, so I moved it to a separate file.
// tailwind.src.css @tailwind components;
@tailwind utilities;/* normalize.src.css */ @tailwind preflight;
Then, I changed my existing tailwind
script in package.json
to build normalize.src.css
separately.
{ "scripts": { "tailwind": "npm run tailwind:normalize && npm run tailwind:css", "tailwind:normalize": "tailwind build src/normalize.src.css -c tailwind.js -o src/normalize.css", "tailwind:css": "tailwind build src/tailwind.src.css -c tailwind.js -o src/tailwind.css" }}
Finally, I loaded normalize.css
in the project.
// src/index.js
...import './normalize.css'import './tailwind.css'import App from './App'...
Now, I can run PurgeCSS on tailwind.css
without fearing it might strip down needed rulesets.
Configuring PurgeCSS
PurgeCSS comes in many flavors: a command-line interface, a JavaScript API, wrappers for Webpack, Gulp, Rollup, and so on.
We used Create React App to bootstrap the website, so Webpack came preconfigured and hidden behind react-scripts. This means I couldn’t access Webpack configuration files unless I ran npm run eject
to get them back and manage them directly in the project.
Not having to manage Webpack yourself has many advantages, so ejecting wasn’t an option. Instead, I decided to use a custom configuration file for PurgeCSS, and an npm script.
I first created a purgecss.config.js
at the root of the project:
module.exports = { content: ['src/App.js'], css: ['src/tailwind.css']}
- The
content
property takes an array of files to analyze to match CSS selectors. - The
css
property takes an array of stylesheets to purge.
Then, I edited my npm scripts to run PurgeCSS:
{ "scripts": { "start": "npm run css && react-scripts start", "build": "npm run css && react-scripts build", "css": "npm run tailwind && npm run purgecss", "purgecss": "purgecss -c purgecss.config.js -o src" }}
- I added a
purgecss
script that takes my configuration file and outputs the purged stylesheet insrc
. - I made this script run every time we start or build the project.
Tailwind CSS uses special characters, so if you use PurgeCSS out of the box, it may remove necessary selectors. Fortunately, PurgeCSS allows us to use a custom extractor, which is a function that lists out the selectors used in a file. For Tailwind, I needed to create a custom one:
module.exports = { ... extractors: [ { extractor: class { static extract(content) { return content.match(/[A-z0-9-:\/]+/g) || [] }, extensions: ['js'] } } ]}
Whitelisting runtime classes
PurgeCSS can’t detect classes that are generated at runtime, but it lets you define a whitelist. The classes you whitelist remain in the final file no matter what.
The project uses React InstantSearch, which generates components with classes that all start with ais-
. Conveniently, PurgeCSS supports patterns in the form of regular expressions.
module.exports = { ... css: ['src/tailwind.css', 'src/App.css'], whitelistPatterns: [/ais-.*/], ...}
Now if I forget to remove a class that I no longer use from App.css
, it will be taken out from the final build, but my InstantSearch selectors will remain safe.
New build, lighter CSS
With this new configuration, my final CSS file has gone from 259 KB to…9 KB! It’s pretty significant in the context of a whole project, especially since many countries still have slow and unstable Internet, and more and more people browse on their phones while on the move.
Accessibility is also about catering for people with low bandwidth connections. It’s not acceptable not to try and help your users with slower Internet, especially if what you’re making them download is dead code.
That’s worth taking a moment to optimize your build. ?
Originally published at frontstuff.io.